Statistical review: frequently given comments.
نویسنده
چکیده
From 2006 to 2014, I have carried out approximately 200 statistical reviews of manuscripts for ARD. My most frequent review comments concern the following: 1. Report how missing data were handled. 2. Limit the number of covariates in regression analyses. 3. Do not use stepwise selection of covariates. 4. Use analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) to adjust for baseline values in randomised controlled trials. 5. Do not use ANCOVA to adjust for baseline values in observational studies. 6. Dichotomising a continuous variable: a bad idea. 7. Student's t test is better than non-parametric tests. 8. Do not use Yates' continuity correction. 9. Mean (SD) is also relevant for non-normally distributed data. 10. Report estimate, CI and (possibly) p value-in that order of importance. 11. Post hoc power calculations-do not do it. 12. Do not test for baseline imbalances in a randomised controlled trial. 13. Report actual p values with 2 digits, maximum 3 decimals. 14. Format for reporting CIs.
منابع مشابه
How to reply to referees' comments when submitting manuscripts for publication
Background: The publication of articles in peer-reviewed scientific journals is a fairly complex and stepwise process that involves responding to referees’ comments. Little guidance is available in the biomedical literature on how to deal with such comments. Objective: The objective of this article is to provide guidance to notice writers on dealing with peer review comments in a way that maxim...
متن کاملTemperature control for simulated annealing.
The optimal cooling schedule for simulated annealing is formulated to derive a differential equation for the time-dependent temperature T(t). Based on this equation, the long-term behavior of T(t), entropy production, and the Kullback-Leibler entropy are studied. For some simple examples, such as a many-level system and the small scale traveling salesman problem, the explicit time dependence of...
متن کاملPeer Reviewers’ Comments on Research Articles Submitted by Iranian Researchers
The invisible hands of peer reviewers play a determining role in the eventual fate of submissions to international English-medium journals. This study builds on the assumption that non-native researchers and prospective academic authors may find the whole strive for publication, and more specifically, the tough review process, less threatening if they are aware of journal reviewers’ expectation...
متن کاملTHREE TYPES OF COMMENTS ON CONTENT: TEACHER VS. PEER FEEDBACK
This study was conducted to examine the effect of three types of comments, i.e. imperatives, questions, and statements, with different communicative purposes, i.e. giving information and making a request, given by an ELT teacher and peers on students’ revision of their writings. Sixty-four female students, between 16 and 26 years old studying at high-intermediate level of English language prof...
متن کاملComments on Multiparameter Estimation in Truncated Power Series Distributions under the Stein's Loss
This comment is to show that Theorem3.3 of Dey and Chung (1991) (Multiparameter estimation intruncated power series distributions under the Stein's loss.emph{Commun. Statist.-Theory Meth.,} {bf 20}, 309-326) may giveus misleading results. Analytically and through simulation, weshow that the Theorem does not improve the given estimator.
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Annals of the rheumatic diseases
دوره 74 2 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2015